Review of The authentic women’s penis size preference chart
Girth size: We took the lifestyle condom girth distribution results and we compared it to the “authentic women’s penis size preference chart. First of all, we think the lifestyles condom girth sizes should be accurate because it is easier to measure girth over length. For girth, circumference is measured at mid shaft of the penis. Furthermore we know that this girth is really inserted into the vagina as it is. So in the ideal range from this picture, there is only a bit more than 1% of the male population within this penis girth range according to the lifestyle condom penis size study.
In that case, we took the penis length data from the journal of Urology study (wessells study) that has been published in 1996. The methodology that has been used to measure penises is “bone pressed”. It means penis sizes registered in this study ARE NOT the inserted penis length in the vagina during sexual intercourse. This is due to the fat pad between the pubic bone and the tip of the glans. The bone pressed methodology measures from the pubic bone to the tip of the glans. We would normally need to subtract the fat length in order to get the real inserted length. In other words, the bone pressed penis sizes are higher than insertable penis length sizes.
If this chart shows perfect inserted lengths, there is less than 7,4% of men in that range.
Besides, This “authentic women penis size preference chart” does not come with any explanation that would described the methodology that has been used to come up with such a chart result. Furthermore many questions can be raised. Who ordered this chart ? for which purposes ?
All of that questions the data authenticity of such a chart.